atlas

Research map / Probabilistic and scientific modeling / Variational and generative sampling

Counting Linear Extensions in Practice: MCMC Versus Exponential Monte Carlo

AAAI 2018 · Probabilistic and scientific modeling › Variational and generative sampling · approach: Stochastic gradient MCMC · 11 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's title only (no summary yet). Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
add structure decomposition to the telescopic product scheme (ablation)Telescopic Product · Random and Bayesian-network-derived posets, 8-512 elementsrunning time: 1-2 orders of magnitude in largest casesHelped
replace Huber 2006 sampler with Huber 2014 Gibbs sampler (ablation)Decomposition Telescopic Product · Random and Bayesian-network-derived posetsrunning time: 1-2 orders of magnitude in largest casesHelped
use Tootsie Pop instead of basic telescopic productCounting linear extensions · Random and Bayesian-network-derived posetsrunning timeHelped
use ARMC instead of MCMC schemesApproximate linear extension counting · Posets up to a few hundred elementsrunning timeHelped
use ARMC instead of exact dynamic programmingCounting linear extensions · Larger posetsfeasible sizeHelped
use exact dynamic programming instead of MCMCCounting linear extensions · Small posetsrunning timeHelped

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy