atlas

Research map / Graph learning / Graph self-supervised learning

Multiplex Graph Representation Learning with Homophily and Consistency

AAAI 2025 · Graph learning › Graph self-supervised learning · approach: Heterophily and imbalance on graphs · 4 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes MGHC, an unsupervised multiplex graph representation learning method that restructures multi-order neighbor relations via ASGC-style correlation coefficients to handle heterophily, and uses a self-expression-matrix-based contrastive loss for node-level and class-level consistency.

Problem

Unsupervised multiplex graph representation learning ignores heterophily in graph structure and only enforces node-level cross-graph consistency, missing class-level consistency.

Approach

Restructure each graph's adjacency using learned multi-order correlation coefficients (positive for homophilic, negative for heterophilic neighbors) in the structure preservation loss, and build a contrastive loss whose positives/negatives come from a closed-form self-expression matrix so same-class nodes across graphs are pulled together.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
add structure preservation loss to contrastive loss (ablation)MGHC · ACMMacro-F1: 78.0 ± 0.4 -> 92.3 ± 0.3Helped
add structure preservation loss to contrastive loss (ablation)MGHC · DBLPMacro-F1: 64.7 ± 0.4 -> 93.0 ± 0.3Helped
add structure preservation loss to contrastive loss (ablation)MGHC · IMDBMacro-F1: 48.3 ± 0.3 -> 57.8 ± 0.3Helped
add structure preservation loss to contrastive loss (ablation)MGHC · FreebaseMacro-F1: 43.4 ± 0.3 -> 61.2 ± 0.5Helped
add contrastive loss to structure preservation loss (ablation)MGHC · ACMMacro-F1: 90.4 ± 0.3 -> 92.3 ± 0.3Helped
add contrastive loss to structure preservation loss (ablation)MGHC · DBLPMacro-F1: 89.1 ± 0.6 -> 93.0 ± 0.3Helped
add contrastive loss to structure preservation loss (ablation)MGHC · IMDBMacro-F1: 53.3 ± 0.5 -> 57.8 ± 0.3Helped
add contrastive loss to structure preservation loss (ablation)MGHC · FreebaseMacro-F1: 60.3 ± 1.1 -> 61.2 ± 0.5Helped
use MGHC instead of CoCoMGmultiplex graph node classification · ACMMacro-F1: 92.0 ± 0.2 -> 92.3 ± 0.3Helped
use MGHC instead of DMGmultiplex graph node classification · FreebaseMicro-F1: 65.6 ± 0.7 -> 64.1 ± 0.6Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: ACM DBLP IMDB Freebase

Benchmarks: ACM DBLP IMDB Freebase

Metrics: Macro-F1 Micro-F1

Baselines: GCN GAT DGI HAN DMGI DMGIattn HDMI HeCo CKD MGDCR DMG CoCoMG

Builds on: ASGC CoCoMG HeCo DMGI

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy