atlas

Research map / Image generation / Autoregressive and latent generation

Multimodal Promptable Token Merging for Diffusion Models

AAAI 2025 · Image generation › Autoregressive and latent generation · approach: Latent diffusion with learned tokenizers · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes Multimodal Promptable Token Merging (MPTM), a training-free token merging method that measures token similarity in a prompt-induced space so diffusion U-Nets and diffusion detectors can merge tokens while keeping prompt-relevant information.

Problem

Token merging for attention-based diffusion models relies on token-to-token feature similarity, which ignores prompt semantics and can merge informative tokens (e.g., cat and snow) together, degrading dense prediction and generation quality.

Approach

Projects input tokens onto a multimodal prompt space (a fusion of prompt-encoder tokens from several modalities) and measures cosine similarity there for bipartite soft matching, plus a threshold-based token unmerging scheme that reduces error propagation at high merge ratios.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
use prompt-induced similarity instead of ToMe similarity for 50% token mergingStable Diffusion v1.5 · ImageNet-1kCLIP-R: 49.33±1.78 -> 58.51±0.72Helped
use prompt-induced similarity instead of ToMe similarity for 50% token mergingStable Diffusion v1.5 · ImageNet-1kFID: 33.15±0.07 -> 33.07±0.06Helped
use prompt-induced similarity instead of ToMe similarity for 50% token mergingDiffusionDet with ResNet-50 · LVIS V1.0 valAP: 25.1 ± 0.3 -> 29.5 ± 0.2Helped
add negative prompts (ablation)DiffusionDet with ResNet-50 and MPTM (50%) · LVIS V1.0 valAP: 29.5 ± 0.2 -> 30.3 ± 0.3Helped
use prompt-induced similarity instead of ToMe similarity for 50% token mergingDiffusionDet with Swin-B · LVIS V1.0 valAP: 34.2 ± 0.8 -> 39.9 ± 0.6Helped
add negative prompts (ablation)DiffusionDet with Swin-B and MPTM (50%) · LVIS V1.0 valAP: 39.9 ± 0.6 -> 41.8 ± 0.7Helped
use MPTM (60%) rather than ToMe (50%)CoDi · AudioCaps valFIDt+a: 16.92±0.52 -> 16.79±0.47No clear effect
use MPTM (60%) rather than ToMe (50%)CoDi · AudioCaps val (Text + Image → Video + Audio)SIM-VA: 0.194±0.035 -> 0.241±0.022Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: ImageNet-1k LVIS V1.0 COCO AudioCaps

Benchmarks: ImageNet-1k LVIS V1.0 COCO AudioCaps

Metrics: FID CLIP-R AP AP50 AP75 FPS s/image GB/image FIDt+a SIM-VA

Baselines: ToMe ToMeSD DiffusionDet CoDi

Builds on: ToMe ToMeSD DiffusionDet CoDi Latent diffusion models

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy