atlas

Research map / Label-efficient and robust learning / Self-supervised and contrastive

Multi-aspect Self-guided Deep Information Bottleneck for Multi-modal Clustering

AAAI 2025 · Label-efficient and robust learning › Self-supervised and contrastive · approach: Self-supervision in supervised pipelines · 9 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes MSDIB, a deep information-bottleneck multi-modal clustering method that uses private, shared, and pseudo-label information as multi-aspect self-guidance, optimized via variational MI bounds.

Problem

Deep multi-modal clustering methods ignore guidance from both feature representations and cluster assignments and fail to remove redundant information between modalities.

Approach

Combines an information-compression term (minimizing MI between inputs and per-modality private features and among private features) with an information-preservation term (maximizing MI between private and shared features and between per-modality and global cluster assignments), trained end-to-end with a deep divergence-based clustering loss and a variational MI approximation.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use MSDIB instead of MFLVCmulti-modal clustering · Caltech-2VACC: 61.5 -> 67.8Helped
Use MSDIB instead of MFLVCmulti-modal clustering · Caltech-2VNMI: 53.6 -> 55.2Helped
Use MSDIB instead of MFLVCmulti-modal clustering · IAPRACC: 47.3 -> 50.6Helped
Use MSDIB instead of DIVICEmulti-modal clustering · IAPRNMI: 23.0 -> 26.7Helped
Use MSDIB instead of MFLVCmulti-modal clustering · ESP-GameACC: 52.1 -> 66.1Helped
Use MSDIB instead of MFLVCmulti-modal clustering · ESP-GameNMI: 39.4 -> 46.5Helped
Use MSDIB instead of MFLVCmulti-modal clustering · MIRFlickrACC: 53.8 -> 58.4Helped
Use MSDIB instead of DIVICEmulti-modal clustering · MIRFlickrNMI: 33.5 -> 37.5Helped
Use MSDIB instead of MFLVCmulti-modal clustering · NUS-WideACC: 45.1 -> 48.6Helped
Use MSDIB instead of MFLVCmulti-modal clustering · NUS-WideNMI: 33.1 -> 33.5Helped
Add information compression (LIC) (ablation)DDC clustering · Caltech-2V, IAPR, ESP-Game, MIRFlickr, NUS-WideACC and NMI: Caltech-2V: 63.4 -> 65.9 (ACC), 51.5 -> 52.9 (NMI); IAPR: 47.9 -> 47.7 (ACC), 24.8 -> 24.9 (NMI); ESP-Game: 59.5 -> 59.2Mixed
Add information preservation (LIP) (ablation)DDC clustering · Caltech-2V, IAPR, ESP-Game, MIRFlickr, NUS-WideACC and NMI: Caltech-2V: 63.4 -> 65.5 (ACC), 51.5 -> 54.1 (NMI); IAPR: 47.9 -> 50.2 (ACC), 24.8 -> 25.6 (NMI); ESP-Game: 59.5 -> 65.1Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Caltech-2V ESP-Game IAPR MIRFlickr NUS-Wide

Benchmarks: Caltech-2V IAPR ESP-Game MIRFlickr NUS-Wide

Metrics: ACC NMI

Baselines: KM Ncuts AmKM AmNcuts CoregMVSC RMKMC SwMC ONMSC TBGL MMGC EAMC DEMC

Builds on: information bottleneck DCIB SIB-MSC deep divergence-based clustering (DDC)

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy